有谁可以帮忙翻译一下这篇介绍《我无罪》（又名修配工）的电影万分感谢啊！

Question

Less than a smash at the box office, John Frankenheimer’s
film also played to mixed critical reception.
Many who reviewed it were in awe of its capturing of one
man’s suffering and, simultaneously, its attainment of a
universal representation of human dignity. Just as many,
however, found these to be its intentions but not its
achievements. Over and again, one finds it spoken of as
“worthy but dreary,” “intense but dull,” a tedious film
that “crawls along on its intentions.” Generally, the acting
has been praised, especially that of Alan Bates,
despite his being miscast as the Russian Jewish protagonist,
and of Dirk Bogarde as Bibikov, the one man in the
czar’s legal system who is sympathetic and helpful to Bok.
The script and the direction have generally been treated
less kindly, a typical objection being to the film’s “synthetic”
quality.
One school of response to this adaptation is that it was
needless. Malamud’s novel, this theory goes, did everything
the film does well and several things the film cannot
duplicate. What remained then for Trumbo and Frankenheimer
was pale imitation. In the words of Robert Kotlowitz:
“The film has nothing to tell us beyond Mr.
Malamud’s novel; it simply reproduces it.” Further, Kotlowitz
argues, unlike Malamud’s work, “the movie depresses
rather than releases us.”
One undeniable oddity of the film is in Frankenheimer’s
having taken it to Hungary to be photographed.
Presumably this seemed the nearest one could come to the
impenetrable Soviet Union. But almost the entire film is
shot indoors, most of it in prison cells.
For all its oddities and all its detractors, the film is occasionally
spoken of in positive superlatives, as that of
Philip Hartung (in Commonweal): “As a hymn celebrating
the survival of the human spirit, ‘The Fixer’ is in a class by
itself.”
THE FIXER
130

Answer 1

　　不到一个粉碎在票房上,约翰Frankenheimer

　　电影也发挥了自己的混合关键的接待。

　　这是许多人敬畏了它的捕捉的一个

　　人的苦难与,同时,它的实现

　　通用表示人的尊严。就像许多,

　　然而,发现这是它的意图而不是它的

　　成就。在一次又一次,你发现它所说的一样

　　“值得但沉闷”、“紧张而枯燥乏味的,”一个冗长乏味的电影

　　“爬在它的意图。“通常,代理

　　受到了赞扬,特别是艾伦·贝茨,

　　尽管他被miscast俄国犹太人的主角。

　　作为Bibikov和德克博加德,一个人

　　沙皇的法律体系是交感神经,有利于那些好的。

　　剧本和方向通常被治疗

　　不,请一个典型的反对是电影的“人工”

　　质量。

　　一个学校的适应性反应,这应该是那样

　　不必要的。•马拉默德的小说,这理论上是这样,了一切

　　这部电影和几件事情搞好电影却不能

　　一式两份。剩下的,然后Trumbo Frankenheimer

　　面色苍白的模仿行为。罗伯特Kotlowitz所说的:

　　“这部电影没有告诉我们超越先生。

　　•马拉默德的小说,它只是复制它。进一步,Kotlowitz”

　　认为,不像•马拉默德的作品,“这部电影的压抑

　　而不是释放我们。”

　　一个不可否认的奇特的电影在Frankenheimer

　　匈牙利拿走去拍照。

　　这大概似乎离我们最近能来参加

　　战败的苏联。但几乎整个电影

　　在室内拍摄,大部分都是在监狱里的细胞。

　　为其特别之处及其批评者,这部电影是偶然的

　　说积极的最高级,那样的

　　菲利普·哈(在公益):“作为一个圣歌庆祝

　　生存的人类的精神,“牢固的是在一个班

　　本身。”

　　牢固的

　　130
　　有些不靠谱 ········· 讲究用一下吧