有谁能给我一份600字的永别了武器的观后感，速度速度啊！！！！高分悬赏！发到我邮箱 jimtc0@yahoo.com.cn

Question

求英文读后感啊！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！速度，采纳追加80分！！！

Answer 1

1
The 1932 film version of Ernest Hemmingway's A FAREWELL TO ARMS will never challenge the likes of ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT--but while it fails to capture the horrors of World War I it is remarkably effective at capturing the novel's sparse and unyielding prose. A good deal of the credit goes to writers Garrett and Glaizer and director Borzage--but the real interest here is not so much in the cinematic interpretation of the Hemmingway novel as it is in the cast, which is remarkable.

Actress Helen Hayes was already among the leading lights of the New York stage when she was lured to Hollywood for a handful of films in the early 1930s--and it is easy to see what all the fuss was about. Plaintive beauty aside, unlike most stage and screen actors of the era she is completely unaffected in her performance and proves more than powerful enough to overcome the more melodramatic moments of the script. She is costarred with Gary Cooper in one of his earliest leading roles, and while the pairing is unexpected, it is also unexpectedly good: they have tremendous screen chemistry, and in spite of the film's dated approach they easily draw you into this story of an ill-fated wartime romance between a nurse and an ambulance driver.

The film is also well supplied with a solid supporting cast that includes Adolphe Menjou, Jack La Rue, and Mary Philips, and while clearly filmed on a slim budget--something most obvious in the battlefront sequences--the camera work is remarkably good. Unfortunately, all this counts for nothing unless you can find a print of the film that you can stand to watch. It is sad but true: the 1932 A FAREWELL TO ARMS seems to have fallen into public domain, and the result is a host of DVD and VHS releases that range from the merely adequate to the incredibly dire.

2
Based on Ernest Hemingway's semi-autobiographical novel about an ambulance driver and a nurse in WWI, this is a beautifully filmed and acted tragic romance, between tiny Helen Hayes, and tall, lanky Gary Cooper, who was 31 at the time and so handsome.
The chaos that surrounds the relationship makes all the participants (including Cooper's best friend, played by Adolphe Manjou) act in ways that are misguided, causing more misfortune, and furthering the anguish of the plot; the chemistry between the stars is wonderful and believable though, and despite its bleakness it is still a tender love story.
There are hellish scenes of war, set to Wagnerian musical themes, and there is an ominous mood that prevails in every scene, even when Cooper and Menjou are out on a drunken spree.
The restoration of this film is excellent, doing justice to Charles Lang's Oscar winning cinematography; the film also won for Best Sound, as well as being nominated for Best Picture.
There have been more recent versions of this story; the 1957 "A Farewell to Arms" with Jennifer Jones and Rock Hudson (which I have not seen), and the 1996 film "In Love and War" with Sandra Bullock and Chris O'Donnell which also has a similar theme, because it was based on Hemingway's youthful WWI romance with nurse Agnes Von Kurowsky; that film suffers because of a weak connection between its actors however, and despite its age, this is a much better film.

3
When David O. Selznick undertook to remake "A Farewell to Arms" he was hoping to top Gone With the Wind. Needless to say, every movie he made after GWTW would be compared to it and deemed inferior. Most of his films have merit. However, "A Farewell to Arms" is a bona-fide disaster on most counts. David O. Selznick, who broke up Jennifer Jones and Robert Walker, was only concerned with Jones and her portrayal. Unfortunately, Jennifer Jones with her distracting facial contortions (which the director should have kept in check) is terrible in this film right down to the last reel where we have to endure an interminable child birth scene and her subsequent death. "A Farewell to Arms" could have been a superb film. Instead, it is an overlong, talky, mishmash of romanticism between two characters who are portrayed by good actors who have no chemistry between them. Hudson was perfect. He did the best he could under less than ideal circumstances. But Jones is the flaw in this film. A fine actress if directed properly and that twisted mouth and deep voice inflection distracting kept in check, Jones is horribly miscast. At the age of 38 she is certainly too old to be playing Catherine, a 23 year old nurse. She is supposed to be british but her playing is stilted and forced, not to mention over-intense. Even the musical score is unmemorable. No wonder this film failed at the box office. And no wonder David O. Selznick never made another film. He was an anachronism by this time. Skip this one folks unless you are a die hard JOnes and Hudson fan. I recommend "Song of Bernadette", "Portait of Jennie" or "Love Letters" if you want to see Jones at her best!

4
"I'm afraid of the rain because sometimes I see me dead in it. And sometimes I see you dead in it." -- Helen Hayes

Frank Borzage had a romanticism and sensitivity to his silent work matched by none, and when sound came along he continued to put a delicate touch on films that required something more than just direction. With Hemingway's "A Farewell to Arms" he brought this romantic tragedy to the screen with a dark and foreboding glow. Gary Cooper and Helen Hayes portray the doomed couple battling for moments of happiness while bombs explode everywhere around them.

Cooper is Frederic, an American driving in the Italian Ambulance Core who meets and falls in love with lovely Katherine (Helen Hayes). She is a nurse and both are simply trying to outlast the reality of war, any romantic notions crushed long ago by the parade of damaged young men. Borzage uses Charles Lang's photography to frame their old-fashioned romance against images of the first war which engulfed the entire globe. Rather than a grand film about war, however, Borzage makes his point by creating a warm and intimate glow to a romance filled with sweet moments of love, yet surrounded with doom.

Through a timid kiss on a public street, a gift of a shared St. Anthony necklace to guard her sweetheart from harm, Katherine's romantically embellished description of her shabby hotel room when writing her love, and a marriage ceremony on a hospital bed where they pretend they can smell orange blossoms on the wind, Borzage creates something timeless while at the same time showing that true love once meant something. When Frederic comes back after their first time together, the viewer knows long before he gets there it is because he needs to let her know it really meant something to him.

Adolphe Menjou is Frederic's misguided party pal who can't understand and tries to interfere, then has a change of heart and helps them reunite under dangerous circumstances, but perhaps too late. For those who haven't seen it, I won't ruin the experience with too many details. The final shot of doves shot against the heavens has much the same effect as the final shot of Borzage's "Three Comrades." This old-fashioned and tender film is an early sound masterpiece anyone with a romantic heart will enjoy.

Answer 2

A bid farewell to arms, isn't the enemy captives, and is the captive of love. I am not good at to protect themselves, is really a give up ego to protect people.As life, already did not need to enter the database of the password can always open all program, can read all the files.I said, this is the captive in the sense of prisoners.When I put my self in the sunshine of hou, I understand from now on can't be camouflage, the day of concealment of disturbing. When I realized I resist helpless, how much time, how many memory irreparably gradually from the heart. After all, fade out the prisoners is a can't resist hurt, is to have enough courage to give up hope, must bear all the survival of the pressure.Originally, in private space, can be immersed in the illusion of alone, can from the dust of the open virtual flower. And a give up protective people is even deceive yourself can't, only by continuously purification inner world.

一个告别了武器的人,不是敌人的俘虏,就是爱的俘虏.我不是不善于自我保护,实在是一个放弃自我保护的人.就如同生命的数据库,已经不需要进入的密码,随时都可以打开全部程序,可以读出全部的文件.我说的俘虏,就是这个意义上的俘虏.当我把自我放到阳光下的时侯,我明白从此不能有所伪装,隐蔽的日子一想起就令人不安.当我意识到抗拒的无奈,有多少时间无可挽回,有多少记忆渐渐从内心淡出.说到底,俘虏就是一个不能抵挡伤害的人,就是要有足够的勇气放弃希望,必须承受生存的全部压力.本来,在属于个人的空间,可以沉浸于独自的幻想,可以从尘埃里开出虚拟的花朵.而一个放弃自我保护的人是连欺骗自己都不能,只有不断地净化内心世界.

追问

字数不够啊，500字啊~！！！

Answer 3

外国名著《永别了武器》读后感
　　一个告别了武器的人,不是敌人的俘虏,就是爱的俘虏.我不是不善于自我保护,实在是一个放弃自我保护的人.就如同生命的数据库,已经不需要进入的密码,随时都可以打开全部程序,可以读出全部的文件.我说的俘虏,就是这个意义上的俘虏.当我把自我放到阳光下的时侯,我明白从此不能有所伪装,隐蔽的日子一想起就令人不安.当我意识到抗拒的无奈,有多少时间无可挽回,有多少记忆渐渐从内心淡出.说到底,俘虏就是一个不能抵挡伤害的人,就是要有足够的勇气放弃希望, 必须承受生存的全部压力.本来,在属于个人的空间,可以沉浸于独自的幻想,可以从尘埃里开出虚拟的花朵.而一个放弃自我保护的人是连欺骗自己都不能,只有不断地净化内心世界.

Answer 4

读《永别了武器》有感
一个告别了武器的人,不是敌人的俘虏,就是爱的俘虏.我不是不善于自我保护,实在是一个放弃自我保护的人.就如同生命的数据库,已经不需要进入的密码,随时都可以打开全部程序,可以读出全部的文件.我说的俘虏,就是这个意义上的俘虏.当我把自我放到阳光下的时侯,我明白从此不能有所伪装,隐蔽的日子一想起就令人不安.当我意识到抗拒的无奈,有多少时间无可挽回,有多少记忆渐渐从内心淡出.说到底,俘虏就是一个不能抵挡伤害的人,就是要有足够的勇气放弃希望,必须承受生存的全部压力.本来,在属于个人的空间,可以沉浸于独自的幻想,可以从尘埃里开出虚拟的花朵.而一个放弃自我保护的人是连欺骗自己都不能,只有不断地净化内心世界. 读《遥远的岛》有感
在《成长的岁月》的《内心的成长》这个分目录里，有篇名叫《遥远的岛》的文章，给我们讲述了两个孩子内心成长的故事。
从前有两个孩子，他们一心向往着海上的那个神秘而异彩纷呈的小岛。可是当终于有一天，他们真的踏上这个小岛之后，才发现，这只不过是一片不成样子的荒野。他们简直不相信自己的眼睛，这就是曾日夜向往的小岛。他们回家之后一直很难过，也从此不再看这个小岛了。
看了这篇文章之后，我感触很深。从对梦的痴心幻想到逐步认识冰冷的现实，也是成长的一个重要的内容。
每一个人的童年时代，都是梦的季节。小时侯，我们阅读的，是美妙的童话，画的，是无拘无束的想象画，听的，是欢快的儿歌，做的，是无奇不有一心向往的梦。小时侯，在我们的眼里，周围每个人都是笑着的，每个故事都有圆满的结局，天空，可以画成绿色，狮子，不会吃人……一切都是多么美好啊。
但是，随着年龄的增长，时间的飞逝，我们长高了，长大了，看到的东西多了，也懂得了不少。其实我们有很多梦想，当我们真的涉足期间，却突然大失所望，世界上任何事物，都比不上人的想象那么美好。我们总会慢慢发现，不是每个人都是笑着的，不是每个故事都有圆满的结局，天空，毕竟还是蓝的，狮子，还是会吃人……
我想起了以前在作文选上看过的一篇作文。它讲的是作者快小学毕业了，想考上重点中学。一天晚上，作者的妈妈请了重点中学的几位老师到家里来吃饭，并给他们送礼，让他们帮帮忙，让作者“顺利”进入重点中学。作者当时感触很深，也很诧异，重点中学不是只有考好试才能进的吗？为什么有些人学习不好也能进重点中学？大人却对作者说：你是小孩，你不懂
长假里，我读了英国作家乔纳森·斯威夫特的《格列佛游记》，小说以辛辣的讽刺与幽默、离奇的想象与夸张，描述了酷爱航海冒险的格列佛，四度周游世界，经历了大大小小惊险而有趣的奇遇。
游记中小人国、大人国里光怪离奇的故事深深地吸引了我，然而给我印象最深的是，1710年格列佛泛舟北美，巧访了荒岛上的慧因国，结识了具有仁慈、诚实和友谊美德的慧因。在慧因国的语言中没有“撒谎”和“欺骗”这样的字眼，人们更不理解它的含义。他们不懂什么叫“怀疑”、什么是“不信任”，在他们的国度里一切都是真实的、透明的。
格列佛在慧因国里度过了一段美好的时光，他完全融入这个社会，以致于与暗喻人类的耶胡交往时形成强烈的反差，因为他们总是以怀疑的眼光看待他的诚实，使他感到失落，对人类产生了极度的厌恶。
我很羡慕文中的主人公有幸能到慧因国，慧因国是我们所追求和向往的理想境地，在这里你不需顾虑别人说话的真假，而在现实的世界，有着太多我们不愿看到的事情常常发生：有人用花言巧语骗取别人的血汗钱、有人拐卖儿童谋取暴利、有人甚至为了金钱抛弃自己的亲身父母。难怪我们的老师、长辈从小就教育我们要提高警惕，不要上当受骗。这与我们提倡的帮助他人、爱护他人是很难统一的。当我遇到有困难的人，要伸出援助之手时，我迟疑；当有人替我解围时，我不敢接受。这些都让我内心感到痛苦、矛盾，无所适从。既妨碍了我去“爱”别人，同时也错过了别人的“爱”，在难道不是一种悲哀吗？
我期盼着有一天我们的社会也像慧因国，孩子们的眼中不再有疑虑，教育与现实是统一的。我愿为此付出努力，也希望大家与我一道，从自己做起，从现在开始做起，让这个社会多一点真诚、少一点虚伪。