①At present,some middle school students often find "the other part of their lives"on the internet,this is called "cyber-love",they treat each other sweetly and sometimes even go for dating .They usually think they`re very blissful and sweet.But their teachers and parents do not!Teachers and parents recognize that to let them fall in love will affect their studies and they will stop them from falling in love in any way!So they often quarrel instead of having a discussion.And this is the most furious topic now如今，很多中学生找“自己的另一半”，这叫作“网恋”，他们通常甜蜜地对待对方，有时他们甚至去约会。他们通常认为他们十分幸福，甜蜜。但是他们的老师和父母不这么认为。他们会以任何方式阻止中学生陷入爱河，所以他们常常以吵架代替交谈。而且这是校园生活中最激烈，最具争议的话题！
Writing is an odd, almost socially-unacceptable way to make a living.
It's a solitary pursuit, for the most part, so civilians -- which is to say "non-writers" -- tend to see only the end result and they remain largely ignorant of the process by which that product is created. For many of us, the gestation period is as important as -- arguably more important than -- the mere physical task of processing words, so much of our nominal workday consists of taking long walks, reading or simply staring off into space.
That's a tough idea for ordinary folks to accept. The notion that someone who is, to all appearances, simply goofing off can be hard at work is foreign to most people.
Blue-collar workers have a particularly difficult time wrapping their minds around it -- and there are a lot of blue collars here in Mariposa.
In my case, the problem of appearances is exacerbated by the fact that I am, by constitution, very much a night person. Where most humans are at their metabolic low point around 3:00am, I'm just hitting my peak, so that's when I tend to be most productive -- and consequently my business day usually ends just about the time everyone else is setting off for their places of work.
Thus, many of my neighbors doubtless think of me as a lazy bum who essentially gets paid for doing nothing -- at least nothing that they couldn't do equally well, if only they put their minds to it.
Which is not to say their impression is necessarily wrong -- but I'm pretty sure that they have no idea just how closely this writing stuff occasionally does resemble actual work. Take this very column, for example: I have, thus far, hammered out four complete -- and completely different -- ledes for the darned thing. Until I generated the one you're now reading, none of them turned out to be satisfactory enough for me to allow anyone to see it except yours truly.
The problem in each case has been that the transition from my opener to the actual topic of the piece simply didn't work for me. I've tried humor, pathos, non sequitur and anecdote -- and none of them did the trick. Every attempt has foundered on the rocky passage from appetizer to main course.
And it's not because I didn't have a topic in mind. In fact, I've known for a month now what I wanted to address in this column.
The Shape of Things to Come
Perhaps the best argument against the telecom industry's absurd faith in the El Dorado of 3G services is that cell phones -- at least in their familiar, present-day form -- are such a crappy way to deliver them.
Their screens are too small to do justice to streaming video and the other gee-whiz graphics that have come to characterize the Internet. Likewise, numeric keypads are a terrible way to input data. Any data.
And handwriting recognition, a la the Palm/Handspring galaxy of devices is too slow for data input.
That's why the RIM Blackberry found such an enthusiastic audience among the early adopters -- to paraphrase the 1992 Clinton campaign mantra, "It's the keyboard, stupid."
That same factor may help account for the resurgent popularity of palmtop computers, such as the Compaq iPAQ. (Although it's fair to say the greatly-enhanced functionality of Microsoft's Windows CE 3.0 has added a lot of value to those platforms that simply didn't exist in older, more limited versions.)
The main problem with those devices is that, small as they are, they're still just too large and heavy for the average consumer. According to the participants in a panel discussion on "The Future of Handsets and UI Design" at DEMOmobile 2001, surveys have repeatedly established that users are increasingly demanding slimmer, lighter phones with longer battery life.
They want phones that can be comfortably carried in a shirt or suit pocket, without causing unsightly sagging -- and palmtops just don't fill that bill.
What they're really looking for is a reasonable facsimily of a general-purpose computer that's as small and light as a modern cell phone, but that somehow also manages to offer a usable keyboard and a color graphics display -- one that's big enough to let them view the same Web pages that their tethered bretheren enjoy.
Which might be why the DEMOmobile panelists all seemed pretty enthusiastic about the demonstration that Danger, Inc. had given earlier in the day of their new "hiptop" platform.
In Spite of All the Danger
From the outside, Danger's prototype looks very much like any ordinary cell phone handset -- and a slightly chunky one, at that. In fact, for the first two minutes of Danger's Thursday morning presentation, CEO Andy Rubin left his demo unit firmly closed, while he talked about the firm's back-end-based active state session management to address the problem of intermittent connectivity -- a gutsy move, because exhibitors' on-stage demonstrations at DEMO shows are limited to a maximum of five minutes.
Rubin's sense of showmanship paid off handsomely, when -- midway through his demo -- he slid the device's 240 x 160-pixel color display up to reveal a full keyboard and mini-joystick concealed underneath.
As if seeing a particularly impressive star shell light up the sky at a fireworks exhibit, the assembled crowd of journalists, venture capitalists and industry analysts let out a collective "O-o-h-h-h!" of delight.
It's hard to tell how much of an impression Rubin's description of the Danger Hiptop's specifications -- they include 8 megabytes of RAM, a Java-based OS and both iRDA and USB data ports, plus a headset port that can also act as a digital camera input -- made on the gathering, but the attendees were all abuzz about that keyboard for the rest of the day.
Bring it on Home
So, will Danger's Hiptop redefine mobile computing and take over the wireless world?
Heck, I dunno.
Danger's managment has managed to attract $32 million in second-round financing in a market that Peter Ziebelman -- a financier himself -- has described as "the nuclear winter of venture capital." That has to count for something.
On the other hand, in order to make compelling business sense, Danger's technology pretty much requires that 3G systems be in place -- the advent of which seems more distant all the time. It also requires that users trust Danger to manage their data at a time when the ASP model has turned out to be a swift route to bankruptcy in the dotcom universe. And it will be up against the entrenched cellular handset vendors, who are notorious for their "not invented here" attitude toward outside technology.
One thing I do know -- regardless of whether Danger's technology succeeds or fails, something not unlike the Hiptop will ultimately have to replace the antiquated standard cell phone, if 3G is ever to become more than a telecom industry pipe dream. Like the Hiptop, whatever that device turns out to be will have to feature a color, graphics-capable display, a full alphanumeric keyboard and some kind of pointing device.
And all of that functionality absolutely must fit comfortably into a shirt pocket and run practically forever on one set of batteries. That's what users want -- and the customer is always right, especially in a global recession.
That Next Big Thing may or may not be a full-on, general-purpose computer in its own right, but, whether it runs Windows or Linux or Java programs, it will need some mechanism that lets it cope with intermittent connectivity. Danger's approach of keeping active session state information on the back end may well be the answer -- after all, server-based session managment is part and parcel of modern Web site design, so it's not exactly a new or revolutionary idea.
But it is a new application of an old -- "old" in Internet terms, that is -- concept. And that is the essence of invention.
I feel a certain kinship with the Hiptop, too. Like my work as a writer here in Mariposa, its appearance is deceiving -- there's a lot more going on than first meets the eye. And, like the lede to this column, it takes a different approach than you might expect. It breaks the rules to solve a problem that at first seems incapable of solution.
I am reminded that the I Ching employs the same ideogram for both danger and opportunity. That seems to me like a useful metaphor for a device that, like Alexander the Great, has ambitions to conquer the world.
Assuming, of course, that it stays around long enough, it just may succeed in that quest. Or, like Alexander's father, Phillip II, it may end up simply setting the stage for a conquest it will not live long enough to see happen.
Either way, it will be interesting to see what happens as we grope towards the first big computing paradigm shift of the 21st Century.
②We meet in this game
This is still infatuated with a network
Let me be your friends one by one to leave the game
To the pursuit of real-life time
Then there is a fishes persist in the conviction
Let me come to the so-called final
Finally, we have a full class to
We also become a game of a husband and wife
Together to chat together to fight together to see the scenery
Appear together in front of friends
I have told you several times whether I would like to leave the game
But do not know what I come back time and again the
Now, I once again decided to leave the game
I do not know how long this can leave I do not dare
In fact, said to leave the game say that the discussion was not as good as you
After the full level because I slowly began to weary of the game
Do you have is a day I insist on the belief line
Recently, I go to bed every night before you would like to
But not like before, like the game's equipment
But in reality you imagine how a person
What kind of character, and so there
We will occasionally illusion of reality can come together
The game took a quarter of my college life time
Reform is the time to leave
As in real life too cruel
I felt pressure brought about by the reality
Whether in life or learning
I really like this now become a regular university, said the
University graduate unemployment is equivalent to
That is not what I want
I am not worried that I can not find a job after graduation
Not because of the need to
Go on like this
I do not even know that after I graduated
I can do what I do
Looking for a job on it is an impossible dream of
Do you still remember
I remember a long time ago I asked you
I ask you to do what - the sun - the stars - the moon
I have become a game where you have the sun
I hope I can become your reality stars
I would also like to leave after you
I hope you will be able to chat with me in the past
I hope we can do Haojuhaosan
The way the election is himself
Life must continue追问
Writing is an odd, almost socially-unacceptable way to make a living.
It's a solitary pursuit, for the most part, so civilians -- which is to say "non-writers" -- tend to see only the end result and they remain largely ignorant of the process by which that product is created. For many of us, the gestation period is as important as -- arguably more important than -- the mere physical task of processing words, so much of our nominal workday consists of taking long walks, reading or simply staring off into space.
That's a tough idea for ordinary folks to accept. The notion that someone who is, to all appearances, simply goofing off can be hard at work is foreign to most people.
Blue-collar workers have a particularly difficult time wrapping their minds around it -- and there are a lot of blue collars here in Mariposa.
In my case, the problem of appearances is exacerbated by the fact that I am, by constitution, very much a night person. Where most humans are at their metabolic low point around 3:00am, I'm just hitting my peak, so that's when I tend to be most productive -- and consequently my business day usually ends just about the time everyone else is setting off for their places of work.
Thus, many of my neighbors doubtless think of me as a lazy bum who essentially gets paid for doing nothing -- at least nothing that they couldn't do equally well, if only they put their minds to it.
Which is not to say their impression is necessarily wrong -- but I'm pretty sure that they have no idea just how closely this writing stuff occasionally does resemble actual work. Take this very column, for example: I have, thus far, hammered out four complete -- and completely different -- ledes for the darned thing. Until I generated the one you're now reading, none of them turned out to be satisfactory enough for me to allow anyone to see it except yours truly.
The problem in each case has been that the transition from my opener to the actual topic of the piece simply didn't work for me. I've tried humor, pathos, non sequitur and anecdote -- and none of them did the trick. Every attempt has foundered on the rocky passage from appetizer to main course.
And it's not because I didn't have a topic in mind. In fact, I've known for a month now what I wanted to address in this column.
The Shape of Things to Come
Perhaps the best argument against the telecom industry's absurd faith in the El Dorado of 3G services is that cell phones -- at least in their familiar, present-day form -- are such a crappy way to deliver them.
Their screens are too small to do justice to streaming video and the other gee-whiz graphics that have come to characterize the Internet. Likewise, numeric keypads are a terrible way to input data. Any data.
And handwriting recognition, a la the Palm/Handspring galaxy of devices is too slow for data input.
That's why the RIM Blackberry found such an enthusiastic audience among the early adopters -- to paraphrase the 1992 Clinton campaign mantra, "It's the keyboard, stupid."
That same factor may help account for the resurgent popularity of palmtop computers, such as the Compaq iPAQ. (Although it's fair to say the greatly-enhanced functionality of Microsoft's Windows CE 3.0 has added a lot of value to those platforms that simply didn't exist in older, more limited versions.)
The main problem with those devices is that, small as they are, they're still just too large and heavy for the average consumer. According to the participants in a panel discussion on "The Future of Handsets and UI Design" at DEMOmobile 2001, surveys have repeatedly established that users are increasingly demanding slimmer, lighter phones with longer battery life.
They want phones that can be comfortably carried in a shirt or suit pocket, without causing unsightly sagging -- and palmtops just don't fill that bill.
What they're really looking for is a reasonable facsimily of a general-purpose computer that's as small and light as a modern cell phone, but that somehow also manages to offer a usable keyboard and a color graphics display -- one that's big enough to let them view the same Web pages that their tethered bretheren enjoy.
Which might be why the DEMOmobile panelists all seemed pretty enthusiastic about the demonstration that Danger, Inc. had given earlier in the day of their new "hiptop" platform.
In Spite of All the Danger
From the outside, Danger's prototype looks very much like any ordinary cell phone handset -- and a slightly chunky one, at that. In fact, for the first two minutes of Danger's Thursday morning presentation, CEO Andy Rubin left his demo unit firmly closed, while he talked about the firm's back-end-based active state session management to address the problem of intermittent connectivity -- a gutsy move, because exhibitors' on-stage demonstrations at DEMO shows are limited to a maximum of five minutes.
Rubin's sense of showmanship paid off handsomely, when -- midway through his demo -- he slid the device's 240 x 160-pixel color display up to reveal a full keyboard and mini-joystick concealed underneath.
As if seeing a particularly impressive star shell light up the sky at a fireworks exhibit, the assembled crowd of journalists, venture capitalists and industry analysts let out a collective "O-o-h-h-h!" of delight.
It's hard to tell how much of an impression Rubin's description of the Danger Hiptop's specifications -- they include 8 megabytes of RAM, a Java-based OS and both iRDA and USB data ports, plus a headset port that can also act as a digital camera input -- made on the gathering, but the attendees were all abuzz about that keyboard for the rest of the day.
Bring it on Home
So, will Danger's Hiptop redefine mobile computing and take over the wireless world?
Heck, I dunno.
Danger's managment has managed to attract $32 million in second-round financing in a market that Peter Ziebelman -- a financier himself -- has described as "the nuclear winter of venture capital." That has to count for something.
On the other hand, in order to make compelling business sense, Danger's technology pretty much requires that 3G systems be in place -- the advent of which seems more distant all the time. It also requires that users trust Danger to manage their data at a time when the ASP model has turned out to be a swift route to bankruptcy in the dotcom universe. And it will be up against the entrenched cellular handset vendors, who are notorious for their "not invented here" attitude toward outside technology.
One thing I do know -- regardless of whether Danger's technology succeeds or fails, something not unlike the Hiptop will ultimately have to replace the antiquated standard cell phone, if 3G is ever to become more than a telecom industry pipe dream. Like the Hiptop, whatever that device turns out to be will have to feature a color, graphics-capable display, a full alphanumeric keyboard and some kind of pointing device.
And all of that functionality absolutely must fit comfortably into a shirt pocket and run practically forever on one set of batteries. That's what users want -- and the customer is always right, especially in a global recession.
That Next Big Thing may or may not be a full-on, general-purpose computer in its own right, but, whether it runs Windows or Linux or Java programs, it will need some mechanism that lets it cope with intermittent connectivity. Danger's approach of keeping active session state information on the back end may well be the answer -- after all, server-based session managment is part and parcel of modern Web site design, so it's not exactly a new or revolutionary idea.
But it is a new application of an old -- "old" in Internet terms, that is -- concept. And that is the essence of invention.
I feel a certain kinship with the Hiptop, too. Like my work as a writer here in Mariposa, its appearance is deceiving -- there's a lot more going on than first meets the eye. And, like the lede to this column, it takes a different approach than you might expect. It breaks the rules to solve a problem that at first seems incapable of solution.
I am reminded that the I Ching employs the same ideogram for both danger and opportunity. That seems to me like a useful metaphor for a device that, like Alexander the Great, has ambitions to conquer the world.
Assuming, of course, that it stays around long enough, it just may succeed in that quest. Or, like Alexander's father, Phillip II, it may end up simply setting the stage for a conquest it will not live long enough to see happen.
Either way, it will be interesting to see what happens as we grope towards the first big computing paradigm shift of the 21st Century.
②We meet in this game
This is still infatuated with a network
Let me be your friends one by one to leave the game
To the pursuit of real-life time
Then there is a fishes persist in the conviction
Let me come to the so-called final
Finally, we have a full class to
We also become a game of a husband and wife
Together to chat together to fight together to see the scenery
Appear together in front of friends
I have told you several times whether I would like to leave the game
But do not know what I come back time and again the
Now, I once again decided to leave the game
I do not know how long this can leave I do not dare
In fact, said to leave the game say that the discussion was not as good as you
After the full level because I slowly began to weary of the game
Do you have is a day I insist on the belief line
Recently, I go to bed every night before you would like to
But not like before, like the game's equipment
But in reality you imagine how a person
What kind of character, and so there
We will occasionally illusion of reality can come together
The game took a quarter of my college life time
Reform is the time to leave
As in real life too cruel
I felt pressure brought about by the reality
Whether in life or learning
I really like this now become a regular university, said the
University graduate unemployment is equivalent to
That is not what I want
I am not worried that I can not find a job after graduation
Not because of the need to
Go on like this
I do not even know that after I graduated
I can do what I do
Looking for a job on it is an impossible dream of
Do you still remember
I remember a long time ago I asked you
I ask you to do what - the sun - the stars - the moon
I have become a game where you have the sun
I hope I can become your reality stars
I would also like to leave after you
I hope you will be able to chat with me in the past
I hope we can do Haojuhaosan
The way the election is himself
Life must continue追问
这位老兄怎么什么都贴啊？
我帮你翻译一段是你贴的是什么吧！(字数限制)
（除了第一段，你自己翻译的）
写作是一个奇怪的，几乎是社会所不能接受的方式来谋生。
这是一个孤独的追求，在大多数情况下，让平民- 这是说“非作家“- 往往只看到最后的结果，他们大致的，其中该产品是创建过程一无所知。对于很多人来说，怀孕期间一样重要。。。
！！！你的答案，惨不忍睹啊！
==对不起，很可惜，那真的不是我自己翻译的，翻译也是跟着贴过来的，我是闭着眼睛回答的
温馨提示：内容为网友见解，仅供参考
无其他回答
求网恋英文辩论文章,正正反方都行,谢啦
Teachers and parents recognize that to let them fall in love will affect their studies and they will stop them from falling in love in any way!So they often quarrel instead of having a discussion.And this is the most furious topic now如今,很多中学生找“自己的另一半”,这叫作“网恋”,他们...
求有关"网恋是否可信"的英语辩论材料!
The net loves has the confidence level, but confidence level unusualsmall. In world not absolute matter, because my side already has thesuccessful example, also has the defeat the example, but is defeatedthe example is bigger than the successful example by far. Therefore ifyou or y...
求是否支持网恋的英文辩词
Whether to support the courtship
网恋的坏处英文答辩
I don·t know~
辩论会: 正方:“网恋能成为婚姻的有效途径 ”求10几个犀利,给力的问题...
1网恋太虚拟，2网恋不切实际，这个社会太现实！3现在的恋爱都不靠谱，更别说看不到购不到的网上啦 4恋爱的途径很多，网恋的可能性20 5婚姻的途径是很多的，有效的还是相亲 6现在也很支持自由恋爱 7相信命中注定冥冥中自有安排
我们的辩论赛确实比谁的口才好,找别人的漏洞,去反驳他,这次我是反方...
俺不知道你想问啥，就是一点，不要用客观的角度去看正方，一定不能顺着他们的思路走，一定要从主观角度看，而且要会在对方不知不觉中套话 和 设圈套让他们进。比如说沉迷游戏，网恋，最让正方棘手的是：国家规定不准未成年人进入网吧。你拿这个话题大做文章就Ok啦、
网络爱情是不是真正的爱情辩论赛反方?
网络爱情是否真正的爱情是一个有争议的话题，不同人有不同的观点。以下是网络爱情的一些争议点，作为辩论赛的反方观点：1. **缺乏真实性和身体接触：** 网络爱情通常建立在虚拟世界中，缺乏真实的身体接触和面对面的交流。这可能导致对对方的真实感受和情感的误解，无法全面了解对方的个性和习惯。2. *...
辩论赛:网恋不能成为婚姻的主要途径
举例：xxx就是网络结婚，生活不到一起。。。所以网络成为婚姻的主要途径对人们来说的不可靠的，这会大大提高人们的离婚率，还不如去相亲，不管如何眼见为实，耳听为虚，所以我方支持网络不能成为婚姻的主要途径 我不会辩论，自己乱写的，不过我希望对你有所帮助。努力 ...
初中生辩论赛各位大侠帮小弟一下啊啊!!!
正方:对方辩友,难道你们要等到网络都发展成熟,等你们入土的前一天才开始学上网的吗? 反方:我们并没说上网没有利呀! 正方:我们恰恰强调的是上网利大于弊嘛? 反方:是有利也有弊,但我们辩论的前提是中学生上网,中学生的天性与网络的三大问题已经说过它们之间矛盾是不可调和的,所以……(反方时间到) 正方:对方辩友...
辩论赛:怎样反驳对方关于“网恋”的问题?
所以我给你提几条建议： 一，你可以选择在正确的分类下去提问，这样知道你问题答案的人才会多一些，回答的人也会多些。 二，您可以到与您问题相关专业网站论坛里去看看，那里聚集了许多专业人才，一定可以为你解决问题的。 三，你可以向你的网上好友问友打听，他们会更加真诚热心为你寻找答案的，甚至...
相似回答
