高分！帮忙写个电影的英语观后感

Question

帮忙写个本杰明巴顿的观后感！要英语的！在四级水平左右！！高分！！还会追加！

Answer 1

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_51c466ef0100d14g.html或者
哈利波特
Harry Potter is a series of seven fantasy novels written by British author J. K. Rowling. The books chronicle the adventures of the eponymous adolescent wizard Harry Potter, together with Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, his best friends. The central story arc concerns Harry's struggle against the evil wizard Lord Voldemort, who killed Harry's parents in his quest to conquer the wizarding world, after which he seeks to subjugate the Muggle (non-magical) world to his rule.

这个杀手不太冷
This film was absolutely amazing. I have spent hours re-watching various scenes and noticing all the perfection with which they are acted and directed. It's not the violence or action sequences that make this movie so great (although they are well done...), but rather moments like where Mathilda knocks on Leon's door. It would be so easy to just film the door opening, but instead we see light illuminating Natalie Portman's face, symbolizing something angelic. And the moment has so much more meaning.

I know a lot of people who have seen this film because they are action fans. I'm not. But I'm glad I finally found it, because it's a wonderful film in so many other ways.
看完电影《gong with the wind》，我很为瑞德这个人物形象所感动。瑞德倜傥潇洒，魅力无穷，而且幽默风趣，坚强勇敢，他富有，又尊重女性，对爱情矢志不渝。他又是一位独具慧眼，又敏锐洞察力和自制力的人，而且有自己的行事准则。他就象无边的大海，就象茂密的森林，可以让女性依偎。斯佳丽结识瑞德后结过两次婚，瑞德对她的初衷却一直没有丝毫改变，这样的恋爱态度令受我感到吃惊。米切尔给了瑞德博大的胸怀，他宽容别人的错误，始终尊重别人的权利。在他心里，男女是完全平等的。我不知道还有什么样的男性比这个形象更加完美了。

See the over movie 《 gong with the wind 》 , I am very to move for ruide this person image.The ruide is handsome and natural and unrestrained, the magic power is endless, humor and wit, the strength is brave, he is rich, respecting again female, to love faithful.He again is a person who can see what others cann't, again sharp insight with the person of the self-control dint, and have to do the standard ownly.He is limitless ocean in elephant, thick forest in elephant, and can make female dependent on.The sijiali becomes friends with the ruide empress knot over the two marriage,however, ruide has been having no to changes the slightest to her the original intention, liking this in love with attitude the ream is felt by me get a fright.The writer gave the great breadth of view in ruide, he tolerate other people's mistake, respecting other people's right always.In his in the mind, men and women are complete equal.I do not know that still had the more perfect than this image what kind of male.

Answer 2

本杰明巴顿没看过，必须是这部电影吗？你可也换一部，《费城往事》怎么样，原创的。

Philadelphia 《费城往事》

Philadelphia is an excellent film that offers us both an interesting look at the world of the late eighties and early nineties. At that time the fear of AIDS was at its height and the President of the United States of America is trying to pass a constitutional amendment outlawing the marriage of homosexual couples.

The film says such a story that the man, called Andrew Beckett by Tom Hanks, pursues his proper rights as a citizen of the US as a man infected with AIDS. The end of the film is simple but it gives us an insightful problem: The man infected with AIDS should be treated as the normal patient with care and help. And it is approved. But for the homosexual couples or gays, they should be treated as the normal one, however, they don’t. Even they are the same as others in the family. But when they go out, the society doesn’t give the family-treatment. Maybe that is why Andrew wants to go to court. He wants to attract the society attention and thought. What attitude should be held when we meet gays?

As we all know, in American, known as a so-called democratic state, they have some uncomfortable feeling on seeing the homosexual couples or gays. Under such a situation, Andrew never gives up but more bravely pursues his rights and the dignity that even though he is infected with AIDS, he should enjoy the right to be treated as the normal one equally. Most important is that AIDS cannot be an excuse they judge ones dignity and morality. Nobody is privileged. Never. Then I recall Declaration of Independence, which holds a credo that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.

But one point should be paid attention to is that even there is some extent prejudices or hate to the gay, they make it open to the public. This is the merit and can be seen as society progress. And on some day, the world is harmonious, and people’s love is an emotion that cannot be bound by race, or sex—something that Philadelphia touches on quite nicely. That is the dream of mine and every person in the global village.

Answer 3

The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button review

"The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is a splendidly made film based on a profoundly mistaken premise. It tells the story of a man who is old when he is born and an infant when he dies. All those around him, everyone he knows and loves, grow older in the usual way, and he passes them on the way down. As I watched the film, I became consumed by a conviction that this was simply wrong.

Let me paraphrase the oldest story I know: In the beginning, there was nothing, and then God said, "Let there be light." Everything comes after the beginning, and we all seem to share this awareness of the direction of time's arrow. There is a famous line by e.e. cummings that might seem to apply to Benjamin Button: and down he forgot as up he grew. But no, it involves the process of forgetting our youth as we grow older.

We begin a movie or novel and assume it will tell a story in chronological time. Flashbacks and flash-forwards, we understand. If it moves backward through a story (Harold Pinter's "Betrayal"), its scenes reflect a chronology seen out of order. If a day repeats itself (Harold Ramis' "Groundhog Day"), each new day begins with the hero awakening and moving forward. If time is fractured into branching paths ("Synecdoche, New York"), it is about how we attempt to control our lives. Even time-travel stories always depend on the inexorable direction of time.

Yes, you say, but Benjamin Button's story is a fantasy. I realize that. It can invent as much as it pleases. But the film's admirers speak of how deeply they were touched, what meditations it invoked. I felt instead: Life doesn't work this way. We are an observer of our passage, and so are others. It has been proposed that one reason people marry is because they desire a witness to their lives. How could we perform that act of love if we were aging in opposite directions?

The movie's premise devalues any relationship, makes futile any friendship or romance, and spits, not into the face of destiny, but backward into the maw of time. It even undermines the charm of compound interest. In the film, Benjamin (Brad Pitt) as an older man is enchanted by a younger girl (Cate Blanchett). Later in the film, when he is younger and she is older, they make love. This is presumably meant to be the emotional high point. I shuddered. No! No! What are they thinking during sex? What fantasies apply? Does he remember her as a girl? Does she picture the old man she loved?

Pitt will of course be nominated for best actor and may deserve it because of his heroic struggle in the performance. Yes, he had to undergo much makeup, create body language and perform physically to be manipulated by computers. He portrays the Ages of Man with much skill. That goes with the territory. But how did he prepare emotionally? What exercises would the Method suggest? You can't go through life waving goodbye. He is born looking like a baby with all the infirmities old age. He grows younger, until he resembles Brad Pitt, and then a younger Brad Pitt, and then -- we do not follow him all the way as he recedes into the temporal distance.

The film was directed by David Fincher, no stranger to labyrinths ("Zodiac," "Fight Club"). The screenplay is by Eric Roth, who wrote "Forrest Gump" and reprises the same approach, by having his hero's condition determine his life experience. To say, however, that Roth "adapted" the original short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald would be putting it mildly. Fitzgerald wrote a comic farce, which Roth has made a forlorn elegy. Roth's approach makes Benjamin the size of a baby at birth. Fitzgerald sardonically but consistently goes the other way: The child is born as an old man, and grows smaller and shorter until he is finally a bottle-fed baby. Not much is said about Benjamin's mother, which is a pity, because he is 5-feet-8 at birth, and I wonder how much pushing that required.

I said the film is well-made, and so it is. The actors are the best: Taraji P. Henson, Julia Ormond, Elias Koteas, Tilda Swinton. Given the resources and talent here, quite a movie might have resulted. But it's so hard to care about this story. There is no lesson to be learned. No catharsis is possible. In Fitzgerald's version, even Benjamin himself fails to comprehend his fate. He's born as a man with a waist-length beard who can read the encyclopedia, but in childhood, plays with toys and throws temper tantrums, has to be spanked and then disappears into a wordless reverie. "Benjamin" rejects these logical consequences because, I suspect, an audience wouldn't sit still for them.

According to the oddsmakers at MovieCityNews, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is third among the top five favorites for best picture. It may very well win. It expends Oscar-worthy talents on an off-putting gimmick. I can't imagine many people wanting to see the movie twice. There was another film this year that isn't in the "top five," or listed among the front-runners at all, and it's a profound consideration of the process of living and aging. That's Charlie Kaufman's "Synecdoche, New York." It will be viewed and valued decades from now. You mark my words.

有些长,你可以删减一下吧,希望能为你所用

参考资料：http://www.veryabc.cn/movie/new/article/2009/0429/article_3178.html

Answer 4

使得