高分悬赏翻译关于物流存货方面的英文文献，最好专业英语，可以追加，我的分全部奉上

Question

Strategic Inventory in Capacitated Supply Chain Procurement
We study the strategic role of inventory in a sequential two-period procurement setting, where the supplier’s capacity in the first period is limited and the retailer has the option to hold inventory. We compare the equilibrium under a dynamic contract, where the decisions are made at the beginning of each
PS：乱码请跳过，是公式。
period, and a commitment contract, where the decisions for both
periods are made at the beginning of the first period. We show that there is a critical capacity
level below which the outcomes under both types of contracts are identical. When the first
period capacity is above the critical level, the retailer holds inventory in equilibrium and the
inventory is carried due to purely strategic reasons; as capacity increases, so does the strategic
role of inventory. The supplier always prefers lower capacity than the retailer, and the
difference between supplier-optimal and supply-chain optimal capacities, and the corresponding
profits, can be significant. Finally, we find that the retailer’s flexibility to hold inventory is
not always good for the participants or for the channel.

and the retailer determines the quantity to
purchase from the supplier and the retail price to

Answer 1

Strategic Inventory in Capacitated Supply Chain Procurement
供应链采购能力限制下的库存策略
We study the strategic role of inventory in a sequential two-period procurement setting, where the supplier’s capacity in the first period is limited and the retailer has the option to hold inventory.
我们研究了连续两期的采购环境中库存的策略地位，在该环境中第一期的供应能力是受限的，销售商可以选择持有库存。
We compare the equilibrium under a dynamic contract, where the decisions are made at the beginning of each period, and a commitment contract, where the decisions for both periods are made at the beginning of the first period.
我们比较了每期开始时决定的动态协议和在第一期开始时决定的每期的委托协议的平衡。
We show that there is a critical capacity level below which the outcomes under both types of contracts are identical.
我们证明存在一个临界能力水平，低于该水平这两种协议下的结果将是相同的。
When the first period capacity is above the critical level, the retailer holds inventory in equilibrium and the inventory is carried due to purely strategic reasons; as capacity increases, so does the strategic role of inventory.
当第一期能力高于临界水平时，销售商持有库存处于平衡状态，库存通过纯粹的策略原因而运作；能力上升时，库存的策略地位也上升。
The supplier always prefers lower capacity than the retailer, and the difference between supplier-optimal and supply-chain optimal capacities, and the corresponding profits, can be significant.
供应商通常愿意使自己的供应能力低于销售商，且最佳供应商和最佳供应链能力之间的不同以及相应的收益是很重要的。
Finally, we find that the retailer’s flexibility to hold inventory is not always good for the participants or for the channel.
最终，我们发现销售商灵活持有库存总是有益于参与者和渠道的。
and the retailer determines the quantity to purchase from the supplier and the retail price to
且销售商决定向供应商购买的数量以及销售价格

Answer 2

战略库存容量的采购供应链
我们研究的战略作用，库存连续两期采购的情况下，供应商的能力，第一期是有限的，零售商可以选择持有库存。我们研究的战略作用，库存连续两期采购的情况下，供应商的能力，第一期是有限的，零售商可以选择持有库存。我们比较平衡的动态下的合同，在作出决定开始时每个期间，并承诺合同，如果双方决定
期间开始时所作的第一阶段。我们发现有一个关键的能力
级别低于该成果根据这两种类型的合同是相同的。当第一
期间能力高于临界水平，该公司持有的库存平衡和
存货进行纯粹由于战略原因;能力增加，因此并不战略
库存的作用。供应商总是喜欢低容量比零售商，以及
供应商之间的区别优化和供应链优化能力，以及相应的
利润，可显着。最后，我们发现，这家零售商的灵活性举行清单
并不总是有益的参与者或通道。 和零售商的数量确定为
购买从供应商和零售价格

Answer 3

这段内容请审阅，我觉得意思还是很清楚的，不会有什么问题。
Strategic Inventory in Capacitated Supply Chain Procurement
在能力受限的供应链采购中的战略存货
We study the strategic role of inventory in a sequential two-period procurement setting, where the supplier’s capacity in the first period is limited and the retailer has the option to hold inventory. 我们研究存货在两阶段顺序采购背景下的战略作用，在这种情况下，供应商在第一阶段的能力有限制，而零售商可以选择拥有存货，We compare the equilibrium under a dynamic contract, where the decisions are made at the beginning of each period, and a commitment contract, where the decisions for both periods are made at the beginning of the first period.我们比较了在动态合同和承约合同下的平衡，在动态合同情况下，决定在每个阶段的开始时做出，而在承约合同的情况下两个合同的决定则都在第一阶段开始时做出。 We show that there is a critical capacity level below which the outcomes under both types of contracts are identical. 我们证明了，存在一个临界的能力水平，低于它，两种合同下的结果是一样的。When the first period capacity is above the critical level, the retailer holds inventory in equilibrium and the
inventory is carried due to purely strategic reasons; as capacity increases, so does the strategic role of inventory. 当第一阶段的能力超过临界水平时，零售商在平衡中就拥有存货，而这样的存货纯粹是因战略的考虑而进行的；随着能力的增加，存货的战略作用也增大。The supplier always prefers lower capacity than the retailer, and the
difference between supplier-optimal and supply-chain optimal capacities, and the corresponding profits, can be significant. 供应商总是宁愿比零售商保持较低的能力，而供应商最佳能力和供应链最佳能力之间的差别，以及相应的效益可以相当明显。Finally, we find that the retailer’s flexibility to hold inventory is not always good for the participants or for the channel. 最后，我们发现，零售商拥有存货的灵活性对于参与者，或对于（销售）渠道来说并不总是很好的
and the retailer determines the quantity to purchase from the supplier and the retail price to零售商决定从供应商那里购买的数量和价格