英语作文,帮忙写个Critique,只要一段话,列点也可以,谢谢,在线等。真心求解,急急急,追加悬赏,

实在不行了,看得一点头绪都没有,马上就要Due了。求英语好的帮忙解答下,有加分。
我不知道老师的原意是要做什么,这里是今天大致将的内容。是要分析这里面哪些句子占了以下几点嘛?
clearly defined terms, fair use of information, logical argumetation, emotionally loaded terms, faulty cause and effect, either/or reasoning, hasty generalization, false analogy, begging the question non sequitur, oversimplification.要原文加我QQ或邮箱308363553@qq.com 谢谢。

clearly defined terms:“the sexsual indifferentiation of roles”Thus speak the Expert.

fair use of information:The front page picture of New York Post means seeing is believing.

emotional loaded terms:The last sentence of paragraph one shows a santimonious saint standing on a high altar expressing sympathy for the suffering of human and hatred for bureaucracy .

faulty cause and effect:The last sentence of paragraph two,no wonder we are a country of low birth rate and a high divoce rate.The conclusion deducted from the blurring of the sexsual indifferentiation of roles is very unreliable.

either/or reasoning:The first and second sentences of paragraph two shows the picture is not of women's equality but nuttiness.The author can only have types of women:either equal or nut,and nothing more.

hasty generalization:The same as the last sentence of paragraph two,with no more reasoning than blurring of the sexsual indifferentiation of roles, the author arbitrarily came to the complaining that we are a country of low birth rate and a high divoce rate.

oversimplicification:The whole passage is full of emotional judgement and bad reasoning and a disgust toward the blurring of the sexsual indifferentiation of roles.
温馨提示:内容为网友见解,仅供参考
无其他回答
相似回答
大家正在搜