求大神翻译心理学问题，在线等！急！！！

Question

1，Highly interpretable reliability (whether the tool gets the same outcome consistently) and validity (whether the tool is measuring what it claims to be measuring) (used as statistical evidence for assessing psychological assessments) for comparisons between individuals.
2，only valid for intra-personal comparisons normally as scores on the scales can’t be treated as absolute values. Strong arguments within the psychologist community (e.g. Johnson et al., 1988) that reliability and validity measures are uninterpretable (often overestimated) when used on ipsative scales (hence, no valid statistical evidence as far as they’re concerned) that makes comparisons between individuals.

Answer 1

1. Highly interpretable reliability (whether the tool gets the same outcome consistently) and validity (whether the tool is measuring what it claims to be measuring) (used as statistical evidence for assessing psychological assessments) for comparisons between individuals.
（用[该工具]作为评估心理评估的统计证据），于人与人之间作比较，它的可诠释的可靠性（不论该工具是否同时得到相同的结果）和有效性（不论该工具是否测量它所声称要测量的）都很高。

2. Only valid for intra-personal comparisons normally as scores on the scales can’t be treated as absolute values. Strong arguments within the psychologist community (e.g. Johnson et al., 1988) that reliability and validity measures are uninterpretable (often overestimated) when used on ipsative scales (hence, no valid statistical evidence as far as they’re concerned) that makes comparisons between individuals.
仅适用于个与人之间的一般比较，因为评核标准上的得分不能被视为是绝对值。在心理学家们之间亦有很大的争议（如约翰逊等人，1988年），他们认为，当用于人与人之间作比较的自比量表上，其可靠性和有效性的量度是不可诠释的（往往被高估），（因此，就自比量表而言，没有统计证据是有效可用的）。

~~~~~纯人手翻译，欢迎采纳~~~~~