求大神帮我翻译一下这句话，急急急。谢谢了! 翻译成英文。
目的: 探讨红外额式体温计与水银体温计测温的一致性，为临床实践提供科学依据。方法:按要求随机抽取120人，其中正常体温80人，发热40人，每组随机分配样本中10人,正常体温8组，发热体温4组，共设12组,每人分别用红外额式体温计和水银体温计同时测量, 连续测3天, 得出数据, 计算差别大小并检验。结果：对正常体温组和发热组采用红外额式体温计测得的值比同时用水银体温计测的略高，但差异都无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：用两种体温计测量出的体温差别不大，红外额式体温计与水银体温计测量体温同样准确和稳定。儿科临床使用红外额式体温计测温数据准确可靠，方便、快捷、安全，值得推广。
求不要网上在线翻译，这我也会。
英语：Objective: To investigate the infrared forehead thermometer and mercury thermometer temperature consistency, providing scientific basis for clinical practice. Methods: according to the requirements of a random sample of120 people, of which80were normal body temperature, fever40, each group was randomly assigned to a sample of 10 people, a normal body temperature of 8groups,4 groups of heating temperature, were divided into 12 groups, each with an infrared forehead thermometer and mercury thermometer at the same time measurement, continuous measurement of3 days, then data calculation and test, the difference between the size of. Results: in normal temperature and heating group using infrared forehead thermometer measured values than while using mercury thermometer to measure the slightly higher, but the differences were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: the two kinds of thermometer to measure the temperature difference is not big, infrared forehead thermometer and mercury thermometer to measure temperature equally accurate and stable. Pediatric clinical use infrared forehead thermometer temperature measuring data is accurate and reliable, convenient, fast, safe, is worth popularizing. 你那里面的词汇及语法太高了，留学生都不一定正确
温馨提示：内容为网友见解，仅供参考
第1个回答 2012-05-09
好高深哦，应该要找专业人士的！！！
第2个回答 2012-05-10
Purpose: discuss the consistency of infrared amount thermometer and mercury thermometer, and get the scientific proof for clinical practice.
Method: randomly sample 120 people, 80 with normal body temperature, 40 with fever, and divided into 12 groups, each groups with 10 people, 8 groups with normal body temperature, another 4 groups with fever. everyone measure the body temperature in continuous 3 days seperately by infrared amount thermometer and mercury thermometer, and make the record. compare the difference and test.
Result: for both normal body temperature groups and fever groups, the values measured by infrared amount thermometer are little higher than by mercury thermometer, but the difference are no meaning in statistics (P>0.05).
Conclusion: the value's difference measured by 2 types of thermometer are small, 2 types of thermometer are accurate and stable with same quality. infrared amount thermometer meause body temperature with high accuracy and reliability for pediatric clinical, it's convinient, time saving, safety, and worthy for promotion.
Method: randomly sample 120 people, 80 with normal body temperature, 40 with fever, and divided into 12 groups, each groups with 10 people, 8 groups with normal body temperature, another 4 groups with fever. everyone measure the body temperature in continuous 3 days seperately by infrared amount thermometer and mercury thermometer, and make the record. compare the difference and test.
Result: for both normal body temperature groups and fever groups, the values measured by infrared amount thermometer are little higher than by mercury thermometer, but the difference are no meaning in statistics (P>0.05).
Conclusion: the value's difference measured by 2 types of thermometer are small, 2 types of thermometer are accurate and stable with same quality. infrared amount thermometer meause body temperature with high accuracy and reliability for pediatric clinical, it's convinient, time saving, safety, and worthy for promotion.
相似回答
