请高手指教如下英文段落翻译 万分感激

Question

Pros • Opportunity to build relationships with those interviewed. • Direct/Indirect nonverbal communication will allow you to pick up additional information. •Details can be clarified when necessary. •You can get a lot of data in a short period of time. •Group synergy can lead to deeper inquiry. •Allows you to obtain several points of view. •You can get a lot of data inexpensively, from many people. •You can get information from people who may otherwise be inaccessible. • Anonymous answers promote greater openness. •Can be used to alert the organization as part of an intervention. • You get first-hand information from what you personally observe. •There is less chance of misunderstanding from someone else’s observation. •You can redirect your focus as situations change. • Saves time, money, and resources. • Data may be more respected from primary researcher. • You may get information that you would not otherwise have access to. •What others don’t see as relevant may be vitally important.
Cons • Getting access to the people you need to interview may not be easy. •Telephone interviews sometimes catch people off guard and keep them from communication. •Those not interviewed may feel “discriminated against”. •Scheduling may be difficult. •There is a risk of “groupthink” or self-censoring in front of the group. •Strong or vocal leader may dominate process. •Questions cannot be clarified. •You can’t identify the exact sources of the responses, so they may be difficult to interpret. •You may not receive open and honest answers to all questions. • Require attention to design and implementation. •You may not have access to the situations that need to be observed. • Direct observation may alter the situation being observed. • It may be difficult to observe enough situations to be able to make generalizations. •The data may be incomplete, unreliable, or out of date. •The data may be difficult and/or time consuming to obtain or understand. • Data obtained may be irrelevant to your research.

Answer 1

赞成? 机会建立与那些的关系采访了? 直接/间接的非语言的通信将允许您拾起其它信息。?Details 可能被澄清如果必要。?You 可能得到很多数据在一个短的时期。?Group 共同作用可能导致更加深刻的询问。?Allows 您获得几个问题的看法。?You 可能低廉地得到很多数据, 从许多人。?You 可能获得信息从也许否则是不能进入的人? 匿名答复促进更加伟大的开放性。?Can 被使用警告组织作为干预一部分? 您获得第一手信息从什么您亲自观察。?There 是较少误会从某人else?s 观察的机会。?You 可能改您的焦点方向当情况改变? 保存时间、金钱, 和资源? 数据也许更被尊敬从主要研究员? 您可以获得您否则不会得以进入对?What 其他人don?t 看的信息因为相关可以非常重要。 负面因素? 得到对您需要采访的人民的通入不能容易。?Telephone 采访有时抓住人卫兵和保留他们从通信。?Those 没被采访也许感觉?discriminated 反对? 。?Scheduling 也许是困难的。?There 是?groupthink 风险? 或自已检察在小组前面。?Strong或声音领导也许控制过程。?Questions 无法被澄清。?You can?t 辨认反应的确切的来源, 因此他们也许难解释。?You 不能收到开放和诚实的答复对所有问题? 要求对设计和实施的注意。?You 不能得以进入对需要被观察的情况的? 直接观测也许修改情况被观察? 它也许难观察足够的情况能做概念化。?The 数据也许残缺不全, 不可靠, 或过时。?The 数据也许困难并且/或者费时获得或了解? 数据被获得也许是毫不相关的与您的研究。