高分悬赏英语翻译 ！
Human relations have commanded people's attention from early times. The ways of people have been recorded in innumerable myths, folktales, novels, poems, plays, and popular or philosophical essays. Although the full significance of a human relationship may not be directly evident, e complexity of feelings and actions that can be understood at a glance is surprisingly great. For this reason psychology holds a unique position among the sciences. "Intuitive" knowledge may be remarkably penetrating and can significantly help us understand human behavior, whereas in the physical sciences such commonsense knowledge is relatively primitive. If we erased all knowledge of scientific physics from our modern world, not only would we not have cars and television sets, we might even find that the ordinary person was unable to cope with the fundamental mechanical problems of pulleys and levers. On the other hand , if we removed all knowledge of psychology from our world problems are solved much as before. We would still ‘ know ‘ how to avoid doing something asked of us and how to get someone was please . one could even offer sensible explanations the “whys ” of much of the self ’s behavior and feelings . in other words, the ordinary person has a great and profound understanding of the self and of the people which ,though unformulated or only vaguely conceived ,enables one to interact with others in more or less adaptive ways .kohler , in referring to the lack of great discoveries in psychology as compared with physics accounts for this by saying “people are acquainted with practically all territories of mental life along time before the founding of scientific psychology”.
Paradoxically, with all this natural intuitive , commonsense capacity to grasp human relations , the science of human relations has been one of the lasts to develop . Different explanations of this paradox have been suggested .one is that science would destroy the vain and pleasing illusions people have about themselves ; but we might ask why people have always loved to read pessimistic, debunking writings ,from Ecclesiastes to Freud. It has also been proposed that just because we know so much about people intuitively , there has been less incentive for studying them scientifically ; why should one develop a theory, carry out systematic observations , or make predictions about the obvious? In any case , the field of human relations , with its vast literary documentation but meager scientific treatment ,is in great contrast to the physics in which there are relatively few nonscientific books.
人际关系引起了从早期的时期的人的注意。 人方式在无数的神话、民间故事、小说、诗、戏剧和普遍或哲学杂文被记录了。 虽然人间亲情的充分的意义可能不直接地是显然的，可以一览被了解感觉和行动的e复杂是惊奇地伟大的。 为此心理学担任在科学之中的独特的职务。 “直觉的”知识也许是卓越地渗透的，并且可能极大帮助我们了解人类行为，而在物理学这样具有常识知识是相对地原始的。 如果我们删掉了科学物理所有知识从我们的现代世界的，我们不仅不会有汽车，并且电视机，我们也许甚而发现普通的人无法应付滑轮和杠杆的根本机械问题。 在另一只手上，如果我们从我们的世界问题取消了心理学所有知识解决作为以前。 我们‘会知道‘如何避免做某事被要求我们，并且如何得到某人请是。 一能甚而提供易察觉的解释许多的“whys ”自已’s行为和感觉。 换句话说，普通的人有一伟大，并且对自已的深刻理解，虽然未系统地阐述或隐晦地只设想，实现一个人与其他互动在更或较不能适应的方式.kohler的和对人民，提到的缺乏巨大发现在与物理比较的心理学方面占此通过说“people熟悉实际精神生活所有疆土沿时间的在建立科学psychology”之前。
Paradoxically，以所有这自然直觉，具有常识能力掌握人际关系，人际关系科学是开发的其中一为时。 这个矛盾的不同的解释被建议.one是科学将毁坏自负，并且中意的幻觉人民有关于他们自己; 但是我们也许问人们为什么总是爱读悲观，揭穿的文字，从Ecclesiastes对弗洛伊德。 也提议正因为我们非常知道关于人直觉地，有科学学习的他们较少刺激; 一开发理论，执行系统的观察或者为什么应该做关于明显的预言？ 无论如何，人际关系的领域，与它浩大的文艺文献，但是微薄的科学治疗，在巨大对比对有相对地少量nonscientific书的物理。
http://www.hao123.com/ss/fy.htm这是翻译器……
我也没那么高学历啊……看不懂……只能给你推荐这个了……
矛盾的是，与这一切自然直观的，常识的能力，把握人际关系，科学的人际关系已其中的持续发展。不同的解释这个悖论已建议，一个是科学会破坏徒劳的和可喜的幻想的人都对自己，但我们可能会问，为什么人们一直喜欢阅读悲观，驳斥文章，从传道书到弗洛伊德。但也有人建议，只是因为我们知道，这么多的人直觉，有已不足的诱因，学习他们的科学，为何要一发展的理论，进行系统的观察，或作出预测明显？在任何情况下，人权领域的关系，其庞大的文学文件，但微薄的科学治疗，是在很大的对比，物理，其中有相对较少nonscientific书籍。本回答被提问者采纳
摆脱,偶可是初中生诶!!!.........???/////0908472356467688^^&($@#_+
直接去网上在百度输入 在线翻译不就行了 那么简单 教你这个方法 以后通用哦~~~
