经济类英语段落篇章，劳烦翻译一下

Question

The standard explanation or justification for governmental regulation of a market is that the market, left to itself, will not produce its particular goods or services in an efficient manner and at the lowest possible cost. Of course, efficiency and low-cost production are hallmarks of a perfectly competitive market. Thus, a market unable to produce efficiently must be one that is not competitive at that time, and that will not gain that status by itself in the foreseeable future. Of course, it is also possible that governments may regulate markets that are viewed as competitive currently but unable to sustain competition, and thus low-cost production, over the long run. A version of this justification for regulation is that the government controls a feature of the economy that the market mechanism of competition and pricing could not manage without help. A short-hand expression economists use to describe the reasons for regulation is “market failure”. A market is said to fail if it cannot, by itself, maintain all the requirements for a competitive situation. Thus, governments in most developed economies have created elaborate systems of regulation for financial markets, which mainly consist of the following parts.

谢谢大家,请不要使用计算机软件翻译,您的翻译将做为我的参考. 我自己对一些经济术语不是特别了解,谢谢.

Answer 1

The standard explanation or justification for governmental regulation of a market is that the market, left to itself, will not produce its particular goods or services in an efficient manner and at the lowest possible cost.
对于政府调控市场的标准解释或正当理由是，（如果）把市场交托给它自身，它就不会用一个有效的方式和尽可能最低的成本来产生其特定的商品或者服务。
Of course, efficiency and low-cost production are hallmarks of a perfectly competitive market.
当然，有效率和低成本的生产是一个完美的竞争市场的标志。
Thus, a market unable to produce efficiently must be one that is not competitive at that time, and that will not gain that status by itself in the foreseeable future.
所以，一个不能有效生产的市场一定就是那个在当时没有竞争力的市场，而且它（指的是不能有效生产的市场）在可预见的未来中将是自己获得不到那样的地位的。
Of course, it is also possible that governments may regulate markets that are viewed as competitive currently but unable to sustain competition, and thus low-cost production, over the long run.
当然，也有可能是政府会去调控那些看上去有竞争力但现在没有办法维持竞争的市场，因此长远之计就是低成本的生产（意思就是那些市场应该在很长的时间里维持低成本生产）。
A version of this justification for regulation is that the government controls a feature of the economy that the market mechanism of competition and pricing could not manage without help.
有关这个调控的正当理由的一个版本是（说）政府控制着一个经济的特点，那就是市场竞争机制和价格是不能在没有帮助下进行管理的。
A short-hand expression economists use to describe the reasons for regulation is “market failure”.
一个经济学家们用来形容调控原因的速记表达方式就是“市场失灵/失败”。
A market is said to fail if it cannot, by itself, maintain all the requirements for a competitive situation.
（如果）一个市场不能自己为一个竞争状况去保持所有的要求，那它（这个市场）就被称为失败/失灵。
Thus, governments in most developed economies have created elaborate systems of regulation for financial markets, which mainly consist of the following parts.
因此，在大多数发达经济中，政府为金融市场创造了（许多）详尽的/精心制作的调控系统，这些系统主要由下面几个部分组成。

本人是学经济的，每一句都是自己翻译的。
楼主自己好好看看吧，希望这些认真的翻译能帮助到您！
有什么不明之处，欢迎继续提问、补充。

Answer 2

政府对市场干涉行为的解释基于市场不能完全通过自身调节来进行高效并且以最成本地生产特定产品或者提供特定服务。由于高效率和低成本是完全竞争市场的标志性特征，所以在市场不能进行效率生产的时候就能断定它不再具有竞争性，并且通常在可预见的未来情况并不能好转。

困死我了，说都不会话了。盖个戳明天接着写

主要是说政府干涉行为对市场的影响和政府该不该干涉。

Answer 3

没人会因为积分费力气翻译的，要么去找熟人要么就要花钱，先给个在线的给你看下

标准的解释或理由，政府调控市场是市场，留给自己，不会产生其特定的商品或服务在一个有效率的方式和在尽可能最低的成本。当然，效率和低成本生产的标志，是一个完全竞争的市场。因此，市场未能出示有效的，必须是一个没有竞争力在那个时间，这将不会获得这种地位本身在可预见的将来。当然，也有可能是各国政府可规范市场，被看作是竞争力，但目前无法维持竞争，因此，低成本的生产，长远之计。一版的这个理由规例的是，政府管制的一个特点，经济，市场竞争机制和价格管理，不能在没有帮助的。短期一方面表达经济学家使用来形容的原因，规例是“市场失灵” 。市场是要失败的说，如果不能，本身保持的所有要求，具有竞争力的情况。因此，各国政府在大多数发达经济体创造了详细的规管制度，为金融市场，其中主要包括以下几个部分组成。