谁能帮我把这篇文章翻译成英语

Question

在线翻译的 勿扰！！！！！！！！
谢谢大家了
基于目前市场环境的特点，首先，应着重解决好施工管理人员成本管理的理念和思维问题。受惯性思维的影响，我们的人多数管理人员的经营思想和管理方式一度停留在计划经济的水平上。而当前的市场状况是：低标价中标，高水平管理。在投标阶段，为了中标，不得不被动地压低标价。如果我们对项目的期望值依然停留在定额计价的高度，中标之后，由于标价低，自然会强调亏损的理由，而不去考虑如何以市场成本为标准降低公司自身成本问题，亏损就成了正常的事情，更谈不上项目效益。我们必须建立这样一个思想，就是以市场价格为标准，确立项目成本、项目效益观念。不能把扭亏的希望单纯寄托在向业主追加投资上，而是要积极主动地去适应市场，通过管理创新、技术创新去降低成本、去创效益。既然我们是以低于社会平均价格中标，说明这就是社会平均价格的发展趋势。我们的内部成本高，项目无法接受中标价，那就是不适应市场发展步伐，必须重新定位，否则就要被淘汰。为此，在具体的实际工作上，应以现有的预算定额和取费标准为参考，主要根据市场变化和企业管理的实际水平，重新确定投标报价和项目管理的新标准。

Answer 1

文章呢？

Answer 2

Based on the current market environment is characterized, first of all, should focus on dealing with construction management staff cost management philosophy and thinking problems. The impact of the inertia of thinking, we have a majority of business management thinking and management methods of the planned economy was at the level. Meanwhile, in the current market situation: low price successful, high-level management. In the bidding stage, in order to the successful bidder, to passively lower price. If we are still expectations of the project at the height of the fixed pricing, successful, as the low price will, of course, the reason for that loss, without considering how to market the company to reduce costs as the standard cost of their loss became normal thing , let alone project benefits. We must build such a principle is at the market price as a standard, established project cost, project-effective concept. Not only the hope of reducing losses to the hands of the additional investment to the owners, but should take the initiative and to adapt to the market and management innovation, technological innovation, to reduce costs, to a benefits. Since we are lower than the average price of successful community, the community that this is the average price trend of development. Our internal high cost, the project could not accept the bid, which is meeting market the pace of development, must re-positioning, it will be be eliminated. To this end, specific and practical work should be fixed to the existing budget and admission fees for the reference standard, primarily on the basis of changes in the market and the actual level of enterprise management, re-bidding and project management of the new standards.