谁能帮我翻译一下下面这段英文啊？急！谢谢了！
Chhabra (2004) argued that festival visitors are a broader segment that should include
participants and exhibitors. The primary argument opined that festival exhibitors are
more than just a product of the festival because they also generate positive economic
impacts for the host region or locality. Chhabra’s argument hinged on expenditures
related to the festival participation of exhibitors on the following items: lodging,
restaurants, gasoline, and grocery stores, and registration fees. Each of these aspects
form the basis that exhibitors merit closer attention in tourism research and they
should not be omitted from future festival economic impact studies.
Chhabra’s (2004) proposal to redefine the festival visitor to include exhibitors
was an advantageous move. Redefining the exhibitor as another festival visitor is only
the beginning in understanding exhibitors’ overall relationship with festivals.
To understand exhibitors’ relationship with festivals, there is a need to identify the
integral components that comprise their presence at the festival and the economic
impact that they may potentially bring. The objective of this paper is to identify those
integral components of the exhibitor relationship and to propose a research agenda for
analyzing festival exhibitors.
CHHABRA (2004) 建议重新定义节日游客应当包含参展商的概念是一个有利的举动.重新把参展商定义为另一类节日游客仅仅是研究参展商与节日关系的开始.
要理解参展商与节日的关系,就必须要分清楚他们在节日经济中带来的影响的比重.本论文旨在分析节日参展商关系的构成,并针对分析提出研究日程表.
不仅仅是一个产品的节日，因为他们也产生积极的经济主机地区或地方的影响。尔斯基的说法支出上的铰链涉及到以下项目：住宿节上的参展商参与，餐厅，汽油和杂货商店和注册费。这些方面中的每一个都形成的基础上，参展商值得密切关注旅游研究和他们不应该被遗漏未来的节日经济影响研究。
尔斯基（2004）的建议，重新定义节日访客，包括参展商是一个有利的举动。重新定义参展商作为另一个节日访客只开始了解参展商的整体关系节日。要了解参展商与节日的关系，有必要识别包括他们的存在的不可分割的组成部分，在节日经济他们可能带来的影响。本文的目的是要找出那些参展商关系的不可分割的组成部分，并提出的研究议程分析节日参展。追问
这个不通顺嘛，不会是机器翻的吧
追答什么机器？
追问就是在线翻译啊。
追答哦，不知道
